By Robert Charles,
November 12, 2014
Robert Charles, a former Assistant Secretary of State to Colin Powell, served as staff director and counsel to US House Speaker Hastert, and conducted oversight of NASA from 1995 to 1999. He is a Washington-DC-based consultant.
Where is America’s
space program going? After a bold promise of American leadership in space
in 2010, as well as plans for a manned Mars mission by the mid-2030s, President
Obama has dropped space like a lead balloon.
With a new
Congressional majority, intent on leadership and accountability, let’s get back
to space, shall we?
Oh and by the way, it
matters.
Until recently,
America’s space program was synonymous with leadership.
Those days are now
gone.
China leaps ahead to
the Moon and Mars, planning a manned mission to the former, robotic missions to
the latter.
Russia is on a beeline
for Mars and its moons.
Near earth orbit is
becoming a parking lot, while space ambitions proliferate from the Middle East
to India.
So, let’s be
frank: gone are the glory days – unless we dig deep, decide to care,
reform and up-fund NASA, make the necessary long-term commitments.
And that is not an easy
mandate, and it will take work.
In the Apollo and
Shuttle eras, America was cooperative, but pushed international comers.
We led. Our leadership
was built on looking forward.
We trusted ourselves,
embraced risk, understood daring exploration, and saw the future as worth
winning.
We had an itch to
learn, to be first -- in a word -- to lead.
In that process,
high-technology jobs were unceasingly created in all 50 states, with spin-offs
from microwaves to GPS, synthetic fabrics to iPhones, helping advance every
sector of the U.S. economy.
But space leadership
was more than economic.
It protected American
national security.
That last is
consequential; it matters for reasons speakable and unspeakable.
American space
dominance is central to stability on Earth.
At present, we are
flatfooted.
Our space program is
going nowhere fast.
Promises made by this
president with alacrity are broken with impunity.
And memories of
America’s Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo days, the glorious and spellbinding moonwalks
are fading.
All but one of the
Mercury astronauts are deceased.
Ten of the Apollo
astronauts are gone.
Four of the 12 who
walked on the moon are gone, including the first among them, Neil
Armstrong.
Yet here we stand,
watching dust blow over our prior leadership as if it mattered not at all.
We revere NASA’s past
more as a relic than step toward a brighter, more ambitious future.
America’s boundless
energy and ambition to explore space is reduced to that quaint, respectful
admiration we accord Egypt’s pyramids, Greek statues and Roman ruins.
In April 2010,
President Obama promised American leadership in space, path-breaking missions
to the Mars.
The difference between
his promise and that of former President John F. Kennedy, more than 50 years
earlier, is stark.
Americans walked on the
moon when Kennedy sent us there.
Obama has, so far, just
added broken promises to the pile.
We are a long way from
Mars.
Since 2010, Obama has:
·
overseen the death of America’s Shuttle Program,
·
cancelled America’s Constellation manned moon
mission,
·
cut America’s unmanned Mars probes (ending two
flights for 2016 and 2018),
·
slashed NASA’s planetary science missions,
·
slapped NASA with a recent 20 percent cut in that
area,
·
failed to reorganize,
·
make cohesive or align NASA behind a core set of big
missions,
·
and barely level-funded space.
Only Congress has saved
any semblance of American space leadership, and this now hangs by a
thread.
Today, ironically, we
are dependent on Russia -- the nation we beat to the moon -- for getting
American astronauts to the orbiting Space Station.
China brings moon
samples back and plans exploratory missions, and we seem to watch
helplessly.
Despite proven
advantage in heavy-lift rockets, we fiddle with experimental options that have
repeat engine failures, blow up, and malfunction on launch.
We talk a good game on
promoting Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) programs, but lag
behind much of the world in sectors we decisively led.
It is time for hard
truths.
Risk comes with space exploration,
but smart decision making, cohesive and mission-focused commitments minimize
risk.
We must press our
advantages, not ignore them, from launch capacity and innovation to economic
strength and raw daring.
We must press them now
into space -- back into space.
That is the promise we got from our president four
years ago -- still unfilled.
So, here is the
solution.
First, a top-to-bottom
review of NASA missions -- all of them.
Let us be tough on
ourselves.
Cut those programs,
whimsies and subsidies driven by purely political or regional interest, that
have no real bearing on national dominance in space.
Kill any programs that
cannot be effectively measured, aligned with the larger NASA mission of space
exploration (manned and unmanned).
Insist on cohesion,
because there currently is none.
Give budget control to
the head of NASA, and insist on national results.
End state-by-state
lunch-snacking on NASA’s money -- that is, yours and mine.
Get NASA to serve the
nation first.
In short, restore that
agency to coherence and greatness.
Once accountability is
established, we can up-fund NASA by a marked number, maybe fifty percent.
The key is to make
America’s commitment to the nation’s future leadership in space real.
This will allow
credible advances in space-based science, from near earth to a permanence on
Mars.
Make this money work
for every American, in a bona fides effort to explore, map, understand, and
populate Mars.
In the process, pioneer
new rocket engine development and deployment, maximize heavy-lift superiority,
and protect America’s national and economic interests.
Make no mistake: China,
Russia, India and others are already pressing the envelope.
We owe it to ourselves
to do the same.
One plan, authored by
close colleague and Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, which is often proffered
under the rubric Unified Space Vision, holds that America should cooperate (not
compete) with others as they aim for the moon, while pressing a sequence of
evolving American steps to pioneering and permanence on Mars.
That plan has been 30
years in the making, and has growing appeal.
But whatever course
taken, the first step is the most important.
Just as 45 years ago,
taking the first step is pivotal.
Finally, take stock of
promises made.
John F. Kennedy’s
promise was not a one-off.
It was
multi-generational; it was to the future.
So was President
Reagan’s eloquent speech in the aftermath of the Challenger accident.
So were speeches --
incremental all -- from both President Bushes and President Clinton.
As we approach the 45th
anniversary of all the Moon landings, it is time to keep faith.
President Obama has a
rare -- if fleeting -- opportunity.
Beyond keeping his 2010
promises, he can be the president who stabilizes a wobbly NASA, realigns the
agency with America’s highest hopes, and resolves to put Americans on Mars.
That will take more
than words.
It will take a remake,
rethink, restart and enlarged budget for NASA.
President Obama now has
a Congress more fully committed to keeping promises, protecting our national
security, economic strength, legacy in space and mapping the future.
He has a more
thoughtful Congress than in many moons.
Rather than
stiff-arming them on this issue, the time is now to act.
A thousand years from
now, America and the world will remember the President and Congress -- is it
this one?
-- who set human kind on course for real space
exploration, put eyes on Mars, launched the great experiment in human
permanence on that foreign planet.
The terrestrial
benefits surrounding this commitment, like those that surrounded Apollo’s moon
missions, are innumerable and enormous.
The opportunity exists
only for a limited time, and that time is slipping.
Beyond that period,
America will cede leadership in space to others.
The consequences of
surrender would be incalculable, likely devastating to national security and
irreversible.
Against today’s
international backdrop, you could say that the time is now or never.
So, Mr. President,
shall we get at it?
No comments:
Post a Comment