Dear All,
This is the 2nd article posted on “The
Truth and Nothing but the Truth” regarding the breaking news on the Benghazi
tragedy when four Americans were killed including the 1st US
Ambassador in 30 years, Chris Stevens.
As information continues to slowly trickle out of a reluctant White House,
CIA, other intelligence organs, and other leaks, it is becoming crystal clear
that President Obama’s behavior was extremely derelict while these brave men were being attacked and
slaughtered over a nine hour period, and then followed up by a false
White House narrative, to cover up his dereliction of duty by trying to blame the whole
matter on a video.
This excellent article explains some of the facts
leading up to the attack and why the president and his staff worked so hard to
cover up the whole matter. The denied
requests for more protective support from the ambassador before going to
Benghazi being one of their major concerns.
But most obnoxiously, it is now clear
that while these men were being attacked, tortured, and killed, the president and his
staff were more concerned about covering their political butts than they
were about wanting to save these men’s lives by
sending in the Calvary to try and rescue them, as often requested by the US Military [Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell]; an order "never given" by the president and a "never given order" he refuses to answer for; while former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton angrily shouted, "What difference does it make?"
During his testimony, an obviously incensed Brig. Gen. Lovell stated, "The fact is, we should have tried", but neither the president or Hillary Clinton will justify their decision not to and the president refuses to explain why he never went to the "Situation room" or for that matter where he was while the conflict was raging.
During his testimony, an obviously incensed Brig. Gen. Lovell stated, "The fact is, we should have tried", but neither the president or Hillary Clinton will justify their decision not to and the president refuses to explain why he never went to the "Situation room" or for that matter where he was while the conflict was raging.
President Obama should seriously consider that what brought down President Nixon wasn't the break-in of the Water Gate Hotel, but instead it was the lying when trying to cover it up. Something that Americans are now witnessing today through Obama's press secretary Jay Carney and is obviously orchestrated by the administration; from inside the closed doors of the Oval Office.
Jay Carney and his fellow White House associates would do well to consider what happened to John Daniel Ehrlichman, Howard Hunt, Charles Colson, Gordon Liddy, and others that were caught up in the Watergate lies to protect President Nixon.
Here is a link for your consideration: CSPAN:Benghazi Consulate Attack Investigation
May 01, 2014
Brig. Gen. Lovell, USAF (Ret.) - had extremely important testimony to offer
Ms. Schake, Ph.D
Mr. Gartenstein-Ross, Ph.D
Mr. Frederic Wehrey, Ph.D
Ron Kirkish
Jay Carney and his fellow White House associates would do well to consider what happened to John Daniel Ehrlichman, Howard Hunt, Charles Colson, Gordon Liddy, and others that were caught up in the Watergate lies to protect President Nixon.
Here is a link for your consideration: CSPAN:Benghazi Consulate Attack Investigation
May 01, 2014
Brig. Gen. Lovell, USAF (Ret.) - had extremely important testimony to offer
Ms. Schake, Ph.D
Mr. Gartenstein-Ross, Ph.D
Mr. Frederic Wehrey, Ph.D
Ron Kirkish
Enough White House Lies on
Benghazi
David Limbaugh | May
02, 2014
The Obama
administration has no shred of integrity left concerning the Benghazi scandal.
Caught in the act with the "loaded gun," those in the administration
are telling us it is a toy pistol, but no honest observer can possibly believe
them anymore.
It took a lawsuit
to force the White House to release emails that reveal just how deliberate and
fraudulent the plan was to deceive the press and the American public about the
cause of the attack on our consulate in Libya.
The incident and a
nearby attack a few hours later, in which four Americans were killed, occurred
in September 2012, just a few short months before the November presidential
election. Obama's foreign policy credibility was on the line, for he had long
boasted that he had al-Qaida on the run, despite his efforts to relax our war
on terror into a law enforcement matter (except for his precious drones, of
course).
Reports emerged
that there had been previous attempted attacks on the consulate and that our
people there had asked for heightened security, which the administration
callously rejected. Was this sheer indifference or a result of Obama's concern
that enhancing security would signal a failure in his magical policy of
appeasing terrorists? Either way, it was disgraceful.
It was obvious at
the time but is now undeniable that with cold premeditation, the administration
hatched a sinister ploy to blame the attacks on an anti-Islam video that had
surfaced on the Internet. There was no evidence that this video had incited the
Benghazi attacks or that the attacks were spontaneous but much evidence that
they were preplanned by al-Qaida terrorists. But the entire White House spin
machine immediately went into overdrive constructing and disseminating this
false narrative, even to the point of having federal authorities arrest the
hapless creator of the video, whom they nabbed on other charges. This was a
horrifying abuse of government power starting at the very top, and it is not
the America any of us should love.
Finally, after a
year of withholding internal emails, the White House, under legal compulsion,
turned them over to Judicial Watch. Included was an email from Ben Rhodes, an
assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic
communications, dated Sept. 14, 2012. Its subject heading was "RE: PREP
CALL with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," and the email was sent to about
a dozen members of Obama's inner circle, including press secretary Jay Carney.
The thrust of the
message was clear: Protect Obama's image (and re-election efforts) at all
costs; American interests and the American public's right to know be damned. It
contained four bullet points:
--"To convey
that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people
and facilities abroad;
--"To
underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a
broader failure of policy;
--"To show
that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm Americans to justice, and
standing steadfast through these protests;
--"To
reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing
with difficult challenges."
It was patently
clear that the administration was not doing everything it could to protect its
people and facilities in Benghazi. It had flat-out ignored or rejected their
multiple requests for enhanced security and their expressed concerns about
possible future attacks. The protests were not "rooted in an Internet
video," as the CIA has made abundantly clear. In his congressional
testimony, former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell said that then-U.N.
Ambassador Susan Rice is the one who linked the video to the Benghazi attacks
but that the video was not part of the CIA analysis. In other words, the
administration made it up out of whole cloth to deflect blame for its policy
failures in relaxing the war on terror, intervening in Libya to seek regime
change with reckless disregard for whether more radical forces would emerge
stronger as a result, and abandoning our people and facilities in Benghazi.
Also, the administration has been anything but resolute in bringing the people
and forces responsible for these attacks to justice.
An email on Sept.
12, 2012, to Rice from Payton Knopf, deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to
the United Nations, confirmed the attacks were "planned in advance"
and "complex," not spontaneous in reaction to a video.
When reporters
grilled Carney about the email from Rhodes, Carney disgraced himself by stating
that the email was referring to the video's effect on all the protests in the
Middle East, not just in Benghazi. Everyone knows that was a flat-out lie. The
prepping of Rice concerned only Benghazi, and Rice's Sunday show lie-fest
concerned only Benghazi because that was the only issue that might affect
Obama's re-election.
These emails
confirm what we already knew: that the White House wholly concocted this idea
to scapegoat the video to save Obama's skin and that everyone who mattered in
the White House, including Obama, knew about it. It is inconceivable that he
didn't.
As the
administration still won't come clean even in the face of these smoldering
guns, it's time to convene a congressional select committee. No more games.
Americans died.
Justice languishes.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
FOX NEWS Reporting: Benghazi White House Cover-up Reveal
May 04, 2014, Sunday - Fox News - Brett Baier
Part 5 o5 5 (video)
Brett Baier: Special Committee for Benghazi
Former NSC Spokesman Tommy Vietor discussed Benghazi with Bret Baier
Boehner taps Gowdy to lead Benghazi select committee
US Congressman Trey Gowdy to the press, “Do you know Why?”
Read The Bill: Resolution to Create Select Committeeon Benghazi
Trey Gowdy On Benghazi : You tell ‘em I’m coming and hell is coming with me
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
FOX NEWS Reporting: Benghazi White House Cover-up Reveal
No comments:
Post a Comment