Tuesday, June 3, 2014

[The TownHall] Enough White House Lies on Benghazi

Dear All,
This is the 2nd article posted on “The Truth and Nothing but the Truth” regarding the breaking news on the Benghazi tragedy when four Americans were killed including the 1st US Ambassador in 30 years, Chris Stevens.

As information continues to slowly trickle out of a reluctant White House, CIA, other intelligence organs, and other leaks, it is becoming crystal clear that President Obama’s behavior was extremely derelict while these brave men were being attacked and slaughtered over a nine hour period, and then followed up by a false White House narrative, to cover up his dereliction of duty by trying to blame the whole matter on a video.

This excellent article explains some of the facts leading up to the attack and why the president and his staff worked so hard to cover up the whole matter.  The denied requests for more protective support from the ambassador before going to Benghazi being one of their major concerns.

But most obnoxiously, it is now clear that while these men were being attacked, tortured, and killed, the president and his staff were more concerned about covering their political butts than they were about wanting to save these men’s lives by sending in the Calvary to try and rescue them, as often requested by the US Military [Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell]; an order "never given" by the president and a "never given order" he refuses to answer for; while former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton angrily shouted, "What difference does it make?"

During his testimony, an obviously incensed Brig. Gen. Lovell stated, "The fact is, we should have tried", but neither the president or Hillary Clinton will justify their decision not to and the president refuses to explain why he never went to the "Situation room" or for that matter where he was while the conflict was raging.
President Obama should seriously consider that what brought down President Nixon wasn't the break-in of the Water Gate Hotel, but instead it was the lying when trying to cover it up.  Something that Americans are now witnessing today through Obama's press secretary Jay Carney and is obviously orchestrated by the administration; from inside the closed doors of the Oval Office. 

Jay Carney and his  fellow White House associates would do well to consider what happened to John Daniel Ehrlichman, Howard Hunt, Charles Colson, Gordon Liddy, and others that were caught up in the Watergate lies to protect President Nixon. 

Here is a link for your consideration: CSPAN:Benghazi Consulate Attack Investigation
May 01, 2014
Brig. Gen. Lovell, USAF (Ret.) - had extremely important testimony to offer
Ms. Schake, Ph.D
Mr. Gartenstein-Ross, Ph.D
Mr. Frederic  Wehrey, Ph.D

 Ron Kirkish

Enough White House Lies on Benghazi

David Limbaugh | May 02, 2014

The Obama administration has no shred of integrity left concerning the Benghazi scandal. Caught in the act with the "loaded gun," those in the administration are telling us it is a toy pistol, but no honest observer can possibly believe them anymore.

It took a lawsuit to force the White House to release emails that reveal just how deliberate and fraudulent the plan was to deceive the press and the American public about the cause of the attack on our consulate in Libya.

The incident and a nearby attack a few hours later, in which four Americans were killed, occurred in September 2012, just a few short months before the November presidential election. Obama's foreign policy credibility was on the line, for he had long boasted that he had al-Qaida on the run, despite his efforts to relax our war on terror into a law enforcement matter (except for his precious drones, of course).

Reports emerged that there had been previous attempted attacks on the consulate and that our people there had asked for heightened security, which the administration callously rejected. Was this sheer indifference or a result of Obama's concern that enhancing security would signal a failure in his magical policy of appeasing terrorists? Either way, it was disgraceful.

It was obvious at the time but is now undeniable that with cold premeditation, the administration hatched a sinister ploy to blame the attacks on an anti-Islam video that had surfaced on the Internet. There was no evidence that this video had incited the Benghazi attacks or that the attacks were spontaneous but much evidence that they were preplanned by al-Qaida terrorists. But the entire White House spin machine immediately went into overdrive constructing and disseminating this false narrative, even to the point of having federal authorities arrest the hapless creator of the video, whom they nabbed on other charges. This was a horrifying abuse of government power starting at the very top, and it is not the America any of us should love.

Finally, after a year of withholding internal emails, the White House, under legal compulsion, turned them over to Judicial Watch. Included was an email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, dated Sept. 14, 2012. Its subject heading was "RE: PREP CALL with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," and the email was sent to about a dozen members of Obama's inner circle, including press secretary Jay Carney.

The thrust of the message was clear: Protect Obama's image (and re-election efforts) at all costs; American interests and the American public's right to know be damned. It contained four bullet points:

--"To convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad;

--"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy;

--"To show that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm Americans to justice, and standing steadfast through these protests;

--"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."

It was patently clear that the administration was not doing everything it could to protect its people and facilities in Benghazi. It had flat-out ignored or rejected their multiple requests for enhanced security and their expressed concerns about possible future attacks. The protests were not "rooted in an Internet video," as the CIA has made abundantly clear. In his congressional testimony, former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell said that then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice is the one who linked the video to the Benghazi attacks but that the video was not part of the CIA analysis. In other words, the administration made it up out of whole cloth to deflect blame for its policy failures in relaxing the war on terror, intervening in Libya to seek regime change with reckless disregard for whether more radical forces would emerge stronger as a result, and abandoning our people and facilities in Benghazi. Also, the administration has been anything but resolute in bringing the people and forces responsible for these attacks to justice.

An email on Sept. 12, 2012, to Rice from Payton Knopf, deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, confirmed the attacks were "planned in advance" and "complex," not spontaneous in reaction to a video.

When reporters grilled Carney about the email from Rhodes, Carney disgraced himself by stating that the email was referring to the video's effect on all the protests in the Middle East, not just in Benghazi. Everyone knows that was a flat-out lie. The prepping of Rice concerned only Benghazi, and Rice's Sunday show lie-fest concerned only Benghazi because that was the only issue that might affect Obama's re-election.

These emails confirm what we already knew: that the White House wholly concocted this idea to scapegoat the video to save Obama's skin and that everyone who mattered in the White House, including Obama, knew about it. It is inconceivable that he didn't.

As the administration still won't come clean even in the face of these smoldering guns, it's time to convene a congressional select committee. No more games.